Cancer in our society II: Sex in Islam

Ann Barnhardt speaking before the Colorado Patriots. VIEWER DISCRETION: Subject not for children.

Pedophilia, incest, bestiality, temporary marriages (prostitution) are accepted ‘legal’ practices in Islam. She speaks of the genetic damage done in the Islamic community because they marry such close relatives–cousins, even first cousins marrying first cousins. This then leads to a very high probability of passing of genetic defects (mutations) that have come from the grandparents, since both cousins would share the same grandparents.

Sexual orientation in the Islamic communities is by choice as in Afghanistan, for example, where man/boy pedophilia is a high as 50%. Afghanistan’s dirty little secret. Bacha Bazi auctions is where they dress up little boys in drag and auction them off to be taken home and raped by the older men who paid for them. This is all approved under the Sharia. Why would we want that in our society? I thank God for the educated Muslims who reject this type of culture. But why don’t more of them identify themselves and speak out against this type of behaviour?

In Afghanistan 60% of all women are married as children. The Taliban argue restricting the age of girls in marriage is un-Islamic. But what is interesting in Barnhardt’s point here is that the homosexual lobby argue that homosexuality is not by choice but due to genetics. In Islam the men follow Muhammad’s lead and marry young girls as young as 6 years old and have sex with boys before they reach the age of puberty. So it is not genetics. God deliver them from Sodom, or His judgments may result in the same as happened to that poor city. Even the lawmakers in Afghanistan are against normal healthy godly laws. See Robert Spencer: The Silent Tragedy of Child Marriage.

Watch this if you have the stomach for this. It is not for the young  or  those weak of mind.

Child brides are now being found in the UK, Canada, Australia, USA and other Western countries as Western government have allowed the mass migration into these lands. Many Muslim countries allow child marriage and Saudi Arabia has no minimum age for a bride.  Some western countries are starting to ban the practice, as we read of the deaths of many young Muslim children only days after their ‘marriages’ (really rapes) due to rupturing of internal organs or when trying to give birth.  The number of child brides now around the world is staggering, not to mention the unhealthy and physically crippling, even life threatening practice, of female genital mutilation.

Why aren’t the fathers protecting their children?  Well, the reason, child marriage is part of orthodox Islam. According to the Qur’an (Surah 33:21), Muhammad is the pattern of conduct for Muslims. But Muhammad himself married a child-bride:

Sahih al-Bukhari 3896—Narrated Hisham’s father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Al-Madina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he wrote the marriage (wedding) contract with Aishah when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.

If you check these claims out be aware of Taqiyya—essentially lying for Islam; a 1,400 year old Muslim tradition —tricking the enemy in wartime by offering a false peace or truce, but preparing to attack once the enemy lets down its guard.  See Taqiyya, holy deception, Qur’an 5:32, from which I quote,

The Qur’an in a variety of verses (2:225, 3:28, 3:54, 9:3, 16:106, 40:28, and 66:2) establishes the religious legitimacy of breaking oaths, lying, unilaterally violating treaties, and generally scheming against non-Muslims.  Allah Himself is described as “the best of schemers” (3:54, 8:30, 10:21), and Muhammad declared, as a justification for murdering unarmed prisoners after offering them safe passage, “war is deceit” (see the Hadith collection of  Bukhari, vol. 4, book 52, nos. 268-271).

Please understand where these sort of religious and cultural practices originate. They are set back in the 7th century A.D. and come from Satan himself. They are against God’s moral laws upon which our society was once built. Unfortunately we are quickly seeing and hearing the collapse of those moral standards. This is not about man deciding what is good, because man is desperately wicked himself. (Jeremiah 17:9) Leave man to make the rules and this is what you get, decay and cancer in our society. You want to know the truth? Start with Genesis and read through to Revelations.

But most of all remember what Jesus said:

Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.  (Matthew 19:14)

Who will save our children?

Soft squishy tissue in 80 million year old dinosaur bones?

mary_schweitzer

Dr Mary Schweitzer even identified the gender of a dinosaur from the bone tissue from its femur. http://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/paleontology/inthenews.html

This video clip is taken from a “60 Minutes” program. Dr Mary Schweitzer discovered flexible ligaments and blood vessels, blood cells, hemoglobin and squishy soft tissue in dinosaur fossils that were supposed to be 68 and 80 million years old.  This was first published this in 1993.1 Then later in 1997,2 and more in 2005.3  In 1993 and 2005 it was in the prestigious journal Science.

How can such tissue survive 80 million years? It can’t. Those dinosaur bones are no more than 4500 years old, probably from dinosaurs killed in Noah’s flood.  But can she or any of her secular colleagues see that they are blinded by their evolutionary worldview?

This evidence, when properly interpreted, makes much more sense in a biblical creationist worldview. The world is only about 6000 years old and dinosaurs were created by God on the sixth day of Creation, the same day God made man. Hence these fossils cannot possibly be tens of millions of years old.

Put on biblical glasses and look at the very same evidence through the lens of God’s Word. It makes much more sense. Continue reading

The geology guessing game!

Presented by Dr Tas Walker of Creation Ministries International.

Produced by the National Education Coalition. Recorded at the

National Christian Apologetics & Worldview Conference

November 7th – 9th 2013, Gold Coast, Qld Australia

Under the theme: TAKING BACK THE CULTURE

The singularity—a ‘Dark’ beginning

Did the universe form spontaneously from nothing?

 

“The universe burst into something from absolutely nothing – zero, nada. And as it got bigger, it became filled with even more stuff that came from absolutely nowhere. How is that possible? Ask Alan Guth. His theory of inflation helps explain everything.”—front cover of the April 2002 issue of Discover magazine

First years

Figure 1: The first several hundred million years after the big bang is when the universe was in its Dark Ages. No ionized hydrogen meant that no sources of light were available during that period. Larger image available from http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~george/reion/.

“Spontaneous creation of the universe from nothing”is the title of a 2014 paper authored by He, Gao and Cai, published in the American Physical Society journal Physical Review D, one of America’s most prestigious journals dealing with physical theory. It purports to outline a so-called mathematical proof that the universe did indeed burst into something from nothing. Continue reading

The Nephilim problem?

The word ‘Nephilim’ is found in the Old Testament Bible and some have suggested that their existence before the global Flood in Noah’s day was the reason God sent it to destroy all air-breathing life (nephesh chayyah) on the surface of the Earth. Certainly there is both biblical and archaeological evidence that giants, giant-sized people, have existed, but was there really ever a Nephilim problem? Could it be that that was at least part of the reason God sent the Flood?

Nephilim-1There is much written about this controversial subject, for example, in books,and on the web2-5 as well as online video discussions and documentaries6 and articles proposing that certain elongated ancient skulls are from the Nephilim.7  Some articles refer to a Nephilim problem and that “part of the reason for God sending the Flood was to stop the Nephilim problem”.5 But was there really a Nephilim problem at all?

The word Nephilim is derived from the Hebrew word נְפִיל/נְפִל nphiyl (nef-eel’), which appears in Genesis 6:4;

There were giants [nphiylim] in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. KJB (= King James Bible)

Various versions translate this as ‘giants,’ or not at all, leaving the untranslated Hebrew word, where the ending ‘im’ indicates it is plural;

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.  ESV (=English Standard Version)  ESV endnote #: giants.

Continue reading